kibeno
HomeProjectsBlogsBooksResearchPhilosophyContact

kibeno

A collection of learnings by exploring everything from system architecture to building open-source projects, this is a chronicle of my journey in software engineering and a space to share what I have learned.

Social
LinkedInGitHubTwitter

Prefer email? Get in touch

© 2025 kibeno. All rights reserved.

AboutArchiveRSS
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Blogs
  4. /
  5. The Cost of Gaussian Elimination Explained

The Cost of Gaussian Elimination Explained

Author avatar

apurba

October 27, 2025

What is Gaussian Elimination?

Gaussian Elimination is a method used to solve systems of linear equations. It systematically eliminates variables to reduce the system into an upper triangular form, followed by back-substitution to find the unknowns.

Essentially, it answers: “How can we convert any system of equations into a simpler one that’s easy to solve?”


Why Analyze Its Cost?

When solving large systems (with n equations and n unknowns), we usually let computers perform the elimination. But before running the algorithm, it’s crucial to know how much computational effort it will take.

In Gaussian Elimination, the main question is:

“How many arithmetic operations (additions, subtractions, multiplications, and divisions) are needed?”

Types of Operations

During elimination, two main types of operations occur:

  1. Division → To find the multiplier λ (pivot ratio).
  2. Multiply–Subtract → To eliminate elements below the pivot (each considered one operation).

So every time we zero out an element below the pivot, we perform a division and several multiply–subtracts.


Step-by-Step Cost Analysis

First Column

We eliminate elements below the first pivot.

  • There are (n − 1) rows below it.
  • For each row, roughly n operations are needed (to modify entries along that row).

Total ≈ n(n − 1) = n² − n operations.

Next Columns

In the next steps, the system gets smaller:

  • When only k equations remain, the cost per stage is roughly k² − k.

To find the total cost, we sum over all stages:

Σ (k² − k) from k=1 to n
= (1² + 2² + … + n²) − (1 + 2 + … + n)
= (1/3)(n³ − n)

Total Forward Elimination Cost

Hence, Forward Elimination requires approximately:

(1/3)(n³ − n) ≈ (1/3)n³

That’s O(n³) complexity.

If you double the size (n → 2n), the cost increases roughly 8×.


Back-Substitution Cost

Once the matrix is in upper-triangular form:

  • The last variable needs 1 operation.
  • The second-last needs 2 operations, and so on.

Total:

1 + 2 + 3 + … + n = (n(n+1))/2 ≈ (1/2)n²

That’s much faster — O(n²).


Right-Hand Side (RHS) Operations

The right-hand side (the constants of each equation) also gets updated during elimination, adding roughly:

n²

operations in total — still smaller than the cubic cost of elimination.


Total Computation Summary

Stage Type Approximate Operations Complexity
Forward Elimination Pivot elimination (n³ / 3) O(n³)
Back Substitution Solving unknowns (n² / 2) O(n²)
RHS Updates Maintaining equations (n²) O(n²)
Total ≈ n³ / 3 O(n³)

Can It Be Faster?

Originally, mathematicians believed that no method could beat (n³ / 3) operations. But the Strassen’s algorithm surprised everyone by multiplying matrices using only 7 multiplications instead of 8.

That reduced the complexity from n³ to nlog₂7 ≈ n2.8.

Further research (notably at IBM) pushed the exponent even lower to about 2.376.

However, in practice:

  • These algorithms have large constants (C).
  • They are hard to implement.
  • They offer little advantage for typical problem sizes.

So, Gaussian Elimination remains the most practical and reliable method in real-world numerical computing.

Explore more

  • Authentication and Authorization in JavaScript
Back to Blogs →

Follow

LinkedinX/Twitter